You could also argue in the opposite direction: Without a plugin architecture, you are at the mercy of the browser developers to implement a certain functionality. The issue here is the one Stallman has been harping on since the dawn of time - closed source is unmaintainable in an extremely profound way.
#Iswiff plugin needed drivers
The closed source drivers (essentially plugins) tethered the linux community to the technically obsolete X server and would have crippled the kernel in a similar way if the kernel devs had accepted closed source plugins.Īpple did wonders driving open standards on the web with the explicit acknowledgement that popular closed source plugins were too dangerous for their platform to implement. A very interesting case study was graphics drivers circa 2005. The linux kernel is an example how an open-source-only plugin system works technical wonders. Often for legal reasons and not technical, or because a proprietary vendor is fighting back (eg video patents the first case, Skype protocol the second). Typically they don't have a feature I want. Open source plugins cause a lot less grief. In the interim, the big grief-causers are usually closed source plugins that crash the host. Speaking as a clueless user closed source plugins, sooner or later, go away. That they are relatively secure is only due to the massive amounts of human-years that went into polishing and bug fixing in the recent decade.) Current browser are horrible monolithic giants, that only mega-corporations (and Mozilla -)) can maintain. But at least in theory, it seems to me that the best architecture would be a minimal browser (just a layout engine), and everything as a plugin. Because the Flash implementation was so bad, we were led to believe that plugins are bad per se.
(I can't help but wonder if we are making a huge historical mistake here by the way. An open source flash player will most likely be used standalone, and not in a browser. All mayor browsers are dropping support for plugins anyway. I don't know if Adobe/Macromedia could have done better, or if the backwards compatibility requirements make it impossible to maintain, but I'd like to see for myself.Īnyway, you have no reason to be afraid. You can even add notes to bookmarks and sort your History list by domain, date, or both ($10).Do you think Flash is insecure in principle, or in implementation? I think it is very much a problem of the implementation. Concierge also lets you view your bookmarks without obscuring the current Safari window. Concierge’s Smart Folders show bookmarks and history items relating to any site you choose.
#Iswiff plugin needed install
You can add items to the Scratchpad via drag and drop, contextual menus, or the Concierge menu (which is added to Safari’s menu bar when you install Concierge) you can open saved bookmarks in Safari in the same ways. The Scratchpad view lets you temporarily store URLs, e-mail links, aliases to files and folders in the Finder, text notes, and links to Address Book cards and groups. ) places a drawer that adds several useful bookmark-related features on the side of Safari windows. You can even set Bookdog to sort your bookmarks on a regular schedule ($10). Bookdog lets you choose which folders of bookmarks should be sorted how they should be sorted (by page name, URL, or domain) and what popular site-name prefixes (such as “Welcome to”) Bookdog should ignore when sorting. ) provides this functionality, as well as the ability to find duplicate bookmarks. One of Safari’s most glaring omissions is the ability to sort your bookmarks alphabetically. MulleSight also provides access to advanced camera and compression settings, and because it supports AppleScript, scripts and other applications can access your iSight through MulleSight to capture images or video (free). ) lets you use your iSight to take snapshots, which it then sends to the Clipboard for past-ing into any application that supports images. Participating in a video chat, your iSight just sits there.
If you have NetNewsWire Lite installed on multiple Macs, you can share RSS subscriptions among them (free).Īpple’s iSight makes a great video-chat camera, but when you’re New articles are highlighted, as well as included in the app’s Dock menu choose a title to view the article in the main window. It organizes your RSS feeds in a three-paned interface. The $25 NetNewsWire is my favorite, but NetNewsWire Lite ( Safari 2.0’s RSS-reading features are nice, but if you’re serious about news feeds, you need a dedicated RSS reader.
0 kommentar(er)
